<p style="text-align:justify; margin-bottom:11px"><strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span calibri="" style="font-family:"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span new="" roman="" style="font-family:" times="">R&eacute;sum&eacute;</span></span></span></span></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify; margin-bottom:11px"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span calibri="" style="font-family:"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span new="" roman="" style="font-family:" times="">On &eacute;value le profit que la didactique pourrait tirer de l&rsquo;&oelig;uvre de Tesni&egrave;re (<i>El&eacute;ments</i> <i>de</i> <i>syntaxe structurale</i>, 1959, posthume), qui a des vis&eacute;es explicitement didactiques. Cette &oelig;uvre foisonnante traite de typologie, de comparatisme, de contrastivisme, et pr&eacute;tend, un peu &agrave; l&rsquo;&eacute;cart des recherches de l&rsquo;&eacute;poque, jeter les bases d&rsquo;une syntaxe tr&egrave;s novatrice, fond&eacute;e sur quelques principes d&rsquo;analyse fondamentaux, en tentant d&rsquo;&eacute;quilibrer structures et valeurs. Force est de constater que seule la premi&egrave;re partie du programme est r&eacute;alis&eacute;e, sans doute en partie du fait de l&rsquo;abondance de la mati&egrave;re analys&eacute;e, d&rsquo;une r&eacute;flexion insuffisante sur les classes de mots et les fonctions, de postulats trop forts et limitatifs. On retiendra des points importants de m&eacute;thodologie&nbsp;: formalisation illustrative (sch&eacute;mas), manipulation tr&egrave;s active des structures, curiosit&eacute; attentive &agrave; d&eacute;busquer les probl&egrave;mes.</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify; margin-bottom:11px"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span calibri="" style="font-family:"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span new="" roman="" style="font-family:" times=""><strong>Mots-cl&eacute;s</strong>&nbsp;: Syntaxe, Connexion, Actant, Circonstant, Translation</span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify; margin-bottom:11px"><strong><span style="font-size:11pt"><span calibri="" style="font-family:"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt"><span new="" roman="" style="font-family:" times="">Abstract</span></span></span></span></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify; margin-bottom:11px"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span calibri="" style="font-family:"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt"><span new="" roman="" style="font-family:" times="">The benefits that didactics could draw from Tesniere&rsquo;s work (<i>El&eacute;ments de syntaxe</i> <i>structurale</i>, 1959, posthumous), which has explicitly didactic aims, are well assessed. The abundant work deals with typology, comparatism, contrastivism, and claims, somewhat apart of the research of the time, to lay the fundations of a very innovative syntax, based on some fundamental principles of analysis, by trying to balance structures and values. It must be said that only the first part of the programme was achieved, no doubt partly because of the abundance of the material analysed, insufficient reflection on word classes and their functions, and overly strong and limitating postulates. We will retain important points of methodology: illustrative formalisation (diagrams), very active manipulation of structures, careful curiosity to uncover problems. </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify; margin-bottom:11px"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span calibri="" style="font-family:"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span new="" roman="" style="font-family:" times=""><strong>Keywords&nbsp;</strong>: <span style="color:black">Syntax, Connexion, Actant, Circonstant, Translation</span></span></span></span></span></p>