<p>R&eacute;sum&eacute;</p> <p style="text-align:justify; margin-bottom:11px"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:107%"><span calibri="" style="font-family:"><b>&nbsp; </b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Cette contribution &eacute;value l&rsquo;hypoth&egrave;se que la hauteur de surplomb th&eacute;orique conditionne les r&eacute;sultats et leur transposition dans des pratiques notamment d&lsquo;enseignement quand le contexte est celui de l&rsquo;acquisition de la scripturalit&eacute;. La m&eacute;taphore de la vue d&rsquo;un &eacute;tage au-dessus d&rsquo;un carrefour sert d&rsquo;analogie. Si le regard descend du 7&eacute;me &eacute;tage ou, au contraire, du premier &eacute;tage, l&rsquo;objet observ&eacute; est le m&ecirc;me&nbsp;: un carrefour, mais la vision&nbsp;: taille des v&eacute;hicules, impression des d&eacute;tails, en est diff&eacute;rente. Entre la vue du ciel et celle de l&rsquo;arpenteur la perception est modifi&eacute;e par la hauteur de surplomb et son choix d&eacute;pendra de l&rsquo;objectif qui justifie la recherche th&eacute;orique ; organisation des feux de circulation ou aide &agrave; la conduite de tel type de v&eacute;hicule. Par cons&eacute;quent, &nbsp;choisir le surplomb de l&rsquo;arpenteur pour traiter l&rsquo;articulation de l&rsquo;oral &agrave; l&rsquo;&eacute;crit des langues dans l&rsquo;acquisition permet de montrer que l&rsquo;articulation est celle de l&rsquo;&eacute;crit &agrave; la parole et que ce ph&eacute;nom&egrave;ne a le statut d&rsquo;un processus acquisitionnel . L&rsquo;opposition n&rsquo;est pas entre l&rsquo;audible des sons et le visible des lettres, mais entre l&rsquo;audible de la parole et le lisible de la graphie que chaque lecteur reconvertit en &eacute;nonciation. Toute une conception du ph&eacute;nom&egrave;ne langue &agrave; revoir&nbsp;!</span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify; margin-bottom:11px"><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:107%"><span calibri="" style="font-family:"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span courier="" new="" style="font-family:">This contribution evaluates the hypothesis that the theoretical overhang height conditions the results and their transposition into practices, particularly teaching when the context is that of the acquisition of scripturality. The metaphor of seeing from a floor above an intersection serves as an analogy. If the gaze descends from the 7th floor or, on the contrary, from the first floor, the observed object is the same: a crossroads, but the vision: size of the vehicles, impression of the details, is different. Between the view of the sky and that of the surveyor, perception is modified by the height of overhang and its choice will depend on the objective which justifies the theoretical research; organization of traffic lights or assistance in driving a particular type of vehicle. Consequently, choosing the surveyor&#39;s overhang to treat the articulation of oral to written languages </span></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span cambria="" math="" style="font-family:">​​</span></span><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span courier="" new="" style="font-family:">in acquisition makes it possible to show that the articulation is that of writing to speech and that this phenomenon has the status of an acquisition process. The opposition is not between the audible of sounds and the visible of letters, but between the audible of speech and the readable of writing that each reader reconverts into enunciation.</span></span></span></span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify; margin-bottom:11px">&nbsp;</p>