<p>L&rsquo;objectif de cette &eacute;tude est de mettre en lumi&egrave;re les m&eacute;canismes qui sont mis en &oelig;uvre par les personnes en contact avec le syst&egrave;me judiciaire afin d&rsquo;&eacute;viter, par tout moyen, la prison. Pour ce faire, la m&eacute;thodologie sur laquelle repose cette &eacute;tude prend en compte l&rsquo;&eacute;tude documentaire associ&eacute;e &agrave; un questionnaire et des entretiens semi-dirig&eacute;s. Pour l&rsquo;analyse des donn&eacute;es recueillies, une approche mixte (quantitative et qualitative) a &eacute;t&eacute; privil&eacute;gi&eacute;e. Les r&eacute;sultats indiquent le d&eacute;p&ocirc;t de plainte comme la phase majeure de tractations &agrave; l&rsquo;amiable, faites d&rsquo;&eacute;normes sacrifices financiers, mais aussi d&rsquo;interventions de personnalit&eacute;s civiles et/ou des forces de d&eacute;fense et de s&eacute;curit&eacute;.</p> <p><em>Abstract : The objective of this study is to shed light on the mechanisms that are implemented by people in contact with the judicial system in order to avoid, by any means, prison. To do this, the methodology on which this study is based takes into account the documentary study associated with a questionnaire and semi-directed interviews. For the analysis of the data collected, a mixed approach (quantitative and qualitative) was preferred. The results indicate the filing of a complaint as the major phase of amicable negotiations, made of enormous financial sacrifices, but also of interventions by civilian figures and/or the defense and security forces.</em></p> <p>&nbsp;</p>